Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This thesis provides a comprehensive analysis of applying artificial intelligence technologies, as established in the Concept approved by Presidential Resolution PQ-155 of 30 April 2025, to digital forensics from the perspective of the 2023 Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code amended by Law No. o‘RQ-1003 of 21 November 2024. The scientific novelty consists in classifying, for the first time in national jurisprudence, the seven technological directions of the Concept according to constitutional risk levels, with a legal regime proposed for each based on the new provisions of the CPC (Articles 81, 87, 88, 95¹, 204¹, 204²). Three hypotheses are tested: the inequality of constitutional risk levels of AI directions, the emergence of five constitutional conflicts from AI application, and the possibility of adapting the national legal framework by 2030. According to our analysis, Part 4 of Article 95¹ of the CPC (new edition) serves as a concrete legal anchor for establishing the regime of AI-based evidence.
References
1. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016, May 23). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it's biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
2. Casey, E. (2011). Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet (3rd ed.). Academic Press.
3. Council of Europe. (2024). Framework convention on artificial intelligence and human rights, democracy and the rule of law (CETS No. 225). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=225
4. INTERPOL & UNICRI. (2023). Toolkit for responsible AI innovation in law enforcement. INTERPOL. https://www.interpol.int/
5. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
6. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisi. (1994, sentabr 22). O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksi [keyingi o‘zgartirishlar bilan, jumladan 2024-yil 21-noyabrdagi O‘RQ-1003-sonli Qonun bilan]. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
7. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisi. (2023, aprel 30). O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Konstitutsiyasi [umumxalq ovoz berishida qabul qilingan tahrirda]. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
8. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisi. (2024, noyabr 21). O‘zbekiston Respublikasining ayrim qonun hujjatlariga raqamli dalillar bilan ishlash tizimini takomillashtirishga qaratilgan o‘zgartirish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish to‘g‘risida (O‘RQ-1003-sonli Qonun). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
9. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2023, noyabr 30). Raqamli mahsulotlar (xizmatlar) iste'molchilari huquqlarini himoya qilish va raqamli texnologiyalar vositasida sodir etiladigan huquqbuzarliklarga qarshi kurashishni kuchaytirish choralari to‘g‘risida (PQ-381-sonli qaror). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
10. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2024, iyun 21). Raqamli kriminalistika sohasida ilmiy-tadqiqot faoliyatini tashkil etish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida (PQ-229-sonli qaror). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
11. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2025, yanvar 22). Raqamli texnologiyalar vositasida sodir etiladigan jinoyatlarga qarshi kurashish sohasi uchun professional kadrlar tayyorlash tizimini joriy etish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida (PQ-17-sonli qaror). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
12. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2025, aprel 30). Ichki ishlar organlari tizimini raqamli transformatsiya qilish bo‘yicha kompleks chora-tadbirlar to‘g‘risida (PQ-155-sonli qaror). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
13. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2026, mart 10). O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Kiberxavfsizlik strategiyasini belgilash va kiberjinoyatchilikning oldini olish tizimini takomillashtirish to‘g‘risida (PF-38-sonli Farmon). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/
14. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), 2024 O.J. (L 1689). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
15. Surden, H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Georgia State University Law Review, 35(4), 1305–1337.
16. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
17. Wisconsin v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. 2016).
18. Završnik, A. (2020). Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights. ERA Forum, 20, 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0