Abstract
Mathematical preparedness is a recurring bottleneck in undergraduate chemistry programmes, where students are expected to move fluently between abstract mathematical reasoning and discipline-specific representations of chemical phenomena. This paper proposes and conceptually examines an adaptive–integrative approach to developing the mathematical competence of future chemists, in which “adaptive” denotes the systematic orientation of mathematical content toward the professional field of chemistry, and “integrative” denotes the meaningful embedding of mathematical concepts within authentic chemical contexts. Drawing on a structured review of research in chemistry education, competence-based mathematics instruction, and integrated STEM pedagogy, the study identifies four design principles: (i) discipline-anchored selection of mathematical content; (ii) context-based and modelling-oriented tasks; (iii) differentiated, adaptive support of learners with heterogeneous mathematical backgrounds; and (iv) authentic, competence-oriented assessment. A pedagogical model linking these principles to the cognitive, operational, motivational, and reflective components of mathematical competence is presented. The discussion outlines testable hypotheses for future quasi-experimental studies in chemistry teacher education and industrial chemistry programmes.
References
1. Hill M, Sharma MD, O’Byrne J, Airey J. Is a conceptual understanding of mathematics vital for chemistry? Education in Chemistry. London: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2023.
2. Clune R, Das A, Jasrasaria D, Rossomme E, Cohen O, Baranger AM. Development of a week-long mathematics intervention for incoming chemistry graduate students. Journal of Chemical Education. 2023;100(9):3458–3467. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00915
3. Ogilvie JF. How can we effectively improve the mathematical capabilities of students of chemistry? Chemistry Teacher International. 2019;1(2):20180007. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2018-0007
4. Mahaffy P, Matlin SA, Holme TA, MacKellar J. Mathematics matters or maybe not: an astonishing independence between mathematics and the rate of learning in general chemistry. JACS Au. 2024;4(8):2890–2904. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c01126
5. Kytmanov AA, Noskov MV, Safonov KV, Savelyeva MV, Shershneva VA. Competency-based learning in higher mathematics education as a cluster of efficient approaches. Bulletin of the Mathematical Sciences. 2016;6(2):145–168.
6. Bennett J, Lubben F, Hogarth S. Bringing science to life: a synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education. 2007;91(3):347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
7. Parsons S, Dingwall S, Reid K. Introduction to contextual maths in chemistry. London: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2020.
8. Niss M, Højgaard T. Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2019;102(1):9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9