CURRENT ISSUES OF RECOGNIZING THE PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM FROM COMPELLED SELF-INCRIMINATION AND TESTIMONY AGAINST CLOSE RELATIVES AS AN INDEPENDENT PRINCIPLE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PDF

Keywords

criminal procedure, principles of criminal procedure, privilege against self-incrimination, right to remain silent, witness immunity, presumption of innocence, fair trial, human rights, close relatives, Criminal Procedure Code.

How to Cite

KHIKMATOV AZIZ. (2026). CURRENT ISSUES OF RECOGNIZING THE PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM FROM COMPELLED SELF-INCRIMINATION AND TESTIMONY AGAINST CLOSE RELATIVES AS AN INDEPENDENT PRINCIPLE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. WORLD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 1(9), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22944379

Abstract

This article examines the constitutional and international legal foundations of the principle of freedom from compelled self-incrimination and compelled testimony against close relatives, as well as its place within the system of criminal procedural law. The study analyzes the relationship between this principle and the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial, human dignity, and the right to defense. Through a comparative analysis of the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, international legal instruments, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, and the criminal procedure legislation of foreign countries, the article substantiates the necessity of recognizing this guarantee as an independent principle of criminal procedure. Based on the findings’, scientifically grounded proposals are developed for introducing a separate provision into the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

PDF

References

1. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Конституцияси.

2. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Жиноят-процессуал кодекси.

3. Фуқаровий ва сиёсий ҳуқуқлар тўғрисидаги халқаро пакт.

4. БМТ Инсон ҳуқуқлари қўмитасининг Фуқаровий ва сиёсий ҳуқуқлар тўғрисидаги халқаро пактнинг 14-моддаси бўйича умумий шарҳи.

5. Украина Жиноят-процессуал кодекси.

6. Арманистон Жиноят-процессуал кодекси.

7. Озарбайжон Республикаси Жиноят-процессуал кодекси.

8. Қозоғистон Республикаси Жиноят-процессуал кодекси.

9. Россия Федерацияси Конституцияси ва Жиноят-процессуал кодекси.

10. Ashworth A. Self-Incrimination in European Human Rights Law.

11. Jackson J. Re-conceptualizing the Right of Silence as an Effective Fair Trial Standard.

12. Langbein J.H. The Historical Origins of the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination at Common Law.

13. Тўлаганова Г. Жиноят процессида гувоҳ иммунитети ва хорижий давлатлар тажрибаси бўйича илмий ишлар.

14. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий суди Пленумининг далиллар мақбуллиги ва процессуал ҳуқуқлар кафолатига оид тушунтиришлари.

15. Roberts P., Zuckerman A. Roberts & Zuckerman’s Criminal Evidence. 3rd ed. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Chapter 13: The Accused’s Privilege Against Self-Incrimination.

16. Волосова Н.Ю. Уголовно-процессуальный институт свидетельского иммунитета: теория, законодательное регулирование и практика: дисс. … докт. юрид. наук. – Москва, 2015.

17. Langbein J.H. The Historical Origins of the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination at Common Law // Michigan Law Review. – 1994. – Vol. 92. – P. 1047-1085.

18. Ashworth A. Self-Incrimination in European Human Rights Law — A Pregnant Pragmatism? // Cardozo Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 30. – P. 751-774.

19. Jackson J.D. Re-conceptualizing the Right of Silence as an Effective Fair Trial Standard // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. — 2009. — Vol. 58. — P. 835–861.