Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
While global sustainability discussions often focus on technological breakthroughs like solar energy or waste management, the linguistic dimension remains significantly under-researched. This article explores the pivotal role of language in shaping ecological consciousness and facilitating international environmental cooperation. By employing a conceptual analysis approach, the study investigates how linguistic framing - such as the transition from “global warming” to “climate emergency” - alters human perception and behavior. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of indigenous languages as repositories of ecological wisdom. The findings suggest that linguistic diversity is as crucial to the planet's health as biological diversity, serving as a fundamental bridge between human society and the natural world.
References
1. Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.47.3.8-21
2. Meadows, D. H., & Randers, J. (2012). The Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Chelsea Green Publishing.
3. Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1654511.
4. Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695.
5. Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Routledge.
6. United Nations. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (The Brundtland Report). Oxford University Press.