Ethnocultural Memory and National Identity: The Concept of "Self" and "Other" in Russian and Uzbek Historical Prose
PDF

Keywords

Ethnocultural memory, alterity, conceptual dichotomy, Russian historical prose, Uzbek literature, comparative stylistics, semiosphere.

How to Cite

Djuraeva , F. (2026). Ethnocultural Memory and National Identity: The Concept of "Self" and "Other" in Russian and Uzbek Historical Prose. GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 1(5), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20043234

Abstract

Cultural identity construction intrinsically relies on the cognitive opposition of alterity. This study interrogates the systemic representations of the "Self" and "Other" concepts within the chronotopes of Russian and Uzbek historical prose. Analyzing a combined textual corpus of 856,420 words, including seminal works by A. Ivanov and P. Kadyrov, the research applies a hybrid methodology of contextual-semantic analysis and statistical corpus processing. Quantitative extraction yielded 2,340 dominant lexical markers delineating binary sociocultural boundaries. Textual evidence indicates a statistically significant divergence in conceptual mapping. Russian historical narratives predominantly spatialized the "Other", anchoring alterity in frontier topography and geographical isolation (64.3% of contexts). Conversely, Uzbek literary matrices localized the "Other" internally (71.2%), utilizing intense socio-hierarchical and religious-philosophical discourse to delineate boundaries. Interpreting these results through Bakhtinian dialogism and Lotman's semiosphere reveals how specific historical trajectories forge divergent cognitive architectures. The findings offer a novel comparative framework for translation studies and intercultural didactics, optimizing cross-cultural comprehension in academic settings.

PDF

References

1. Assmann J. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

2. Bakhtin MM. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press; 2014.

3. Lotman YM. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B. Tauris; 2000.

4. Бабенко ЛГ. Филологический анализ текста. Основы теории, принципы и аспекты анализа. Москва: Академический проект; 2018.

5. Борисова ЕБ. Этнокультурные концепты в художественной картине мира исторического романа. Филологические науки. 2020;14(2):112-119.

6. Данияров БХ. Поэтика узбекского исторического романа: эволюция хронотопа. Ташкент: Фан; 2017.

7. Кадыров П. Звездные ночи (Юлдузли тунлар). Ташкент: Шарк; 2015.

8. Каримов НФ. Этнокультурная специфика бинарной оппозиции «свой-чужой» в тюркских языках. Вестник Центральноазиатского университета. 2021;8(4):45-52.

9. Соколова ЕВ. Альтеритет в пространстве исторического нарратива: опыт корпусного исследования. Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2019;3:77-85.

10. Якубов О. Сокровища Улугбека (Улуғбек хазинаси). Ташкент: Гафур Гулям; 2018.